Shakuntalabai Tukaram Ghatte vs Venkat Narayan Valse Advocate - Patil Dhananjay T — 1900059/2009
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING on 30th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA160000772009
Filing Number
1900059/2009
Filing Date
14-12-2009
Registration No
1900059/2009
Registration Date
14-12-2009
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
30th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED / REJECTED AFTER FULL TRIAL / HEARING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shakuntalabai Tukaram Ghatte
Adv. Sankaye Vikram N
Respondent(s)
Venkat Narayan Valse Advocate - Patil Dhananjay T
Ashok Venkatrao Valse
Ankush Venkatrao Valse
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-05-2026 | Judgment |
| 26-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 07-05-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shakuntalabai Tukaram Ghatte vs. Venkat Narayan Valse & Ors. The court dismissed a partition suit filed by Shakuntalabai claiming ancestral property rights. Although the court found she proved her relationship to Pandurang (establishing Issue 1 affirmatively), it held the suit was barred by limitation and she had no inheritance rights under pre-1956 Hindu law where daughters couldn't inherit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Shakuntalabai Tukaram Ghatte vs. Venkat Narayan Valse & Ors. The court dismissed a partition suit filed by Shakuntalabai claiming ancestral property rights. Although the court found she proved her relationship to Pandurang (establishing Issue 1 affirmatively), it held the suit was barred by limitation and she had no inheritance rights under pre-1956 Hindu law where daughters couldn't inherit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts