The State of Maharashtra vs Balaji Dashrath Biradar — 3/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160000262024
Filing Number
5/2024
Filing Date
20-01-2024
Registration No
3/2024
Registration Date
20-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
377
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Balaji Dashrath Biradar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 11-12-2025 | Appearance |
| 13-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 11-08-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: The State of Maharashtra v. Balaji Dashrath Biradar (3/2024) The court dismissed the criminal case against Balaji Dashrath Biradar registered under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65-E, finding no progress in investigation after FIR registration on 20/01/2024. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish its case, as the accused could not be apprehended and adequate evidence was insufficient to proceed. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 281, and the case records were ordered to be destroyed as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: The State of Maharashtra v. Balaji Dashrath Biradar (3/2024) The court dismissed the criminal case against Balaji Dashrath Biradar registered under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65-E, finding no progress in investigation after FIR registration on 20/01/2024. The court held that the prosecution failed to establish its case, as the accused could not be apprehended and adequate evidence was insufficient to proceed. Accordingly, the accused was acquitted under CrPC Section 281, and the case records were ordered to be destroyed as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts