Vikram alieas Dattatraya Nagorao Pinate vs Govind Dnyanoba Madde and others 1 Advocate - Patil Balaji V — 1900051/2008
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA160000012001
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
1900051/2008
Filing Date
30-04-2001
Registration No
1900051/2008
Registration Date
30-04-2001
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vikram alieas Dattatraya Nagorao Pinate
Adv. Gundre Bharat M
Respondent(s)
Govind Dnyanoba Madde and others 1 Advocate - Patil Balaji V
Shesherao Dnyanoba Madde
Adv. Patil Balaji V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Arguments
Arguments
Compliance
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 08-04-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
In RCS No.51/2008 (Vikram v. Govind & Ors.), the Civil Judge at Deoni allowed two applications regarding document production in this suit for recovery of possession. The court permitted defendants to produce revenue records (village forms 7/12 and mutations from 1959-2004) as evidence, treating them as public documents with presumptive value admissible without oral evidence. The court also allowed defendants to file documents at a belated stage subject to costs of Rs.500/-, finding that material evidence should not be refused despite procedural delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In RCS No.51/2008 (Vikram v. Govind & Ors.), the Civil Judge at Deoni allowed two applications regarding document production in this suit for recovery of possession. The court permitted defendants to produce revenue records (village forms 7/12 and mutations from 1959-2004) as evidence, treating them as public documents with presumptive value admissible without oral evidence. The court also allowed defendants to file documents at a belated stage subject to costs of Rs.500/-, finding that material evidence should not be refused despite procedural delays. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts