Shivam So Madhav Raiphale - E-Filed vs Nill — 392/2025
Case under Bombay Reorganisation Act Section VII. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA150014352025
e-Filing Number
01-12-2025
Filing Number
634/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
392/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivam So Madhav Raiphale - E-Filed
Adv. NANDAGAWALE BHEEMASHANKAR BABURAO
Surekha Wo Madhav Raiphale
Adv. NANDAGAWALE BHEEMASHANKAR BABURAO
Shankar So Madhav Raiphale
Adv. NANDAGAWALE BHEEMASHANKAR BABURAO
Kamlabai Wo Digambar Raiphale
Adv. NANDAGAWALE BHEEMASHANKAR BABURAO
Respondent(s)
Nill
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 14-02-2026 | Arguments |
| 02-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 392/2025 The court granted Shivam Madhav Raiphale's petition for a heirship certificate, recognizing him and two other heirs (Surekha and Shankar) as legal heirs of the deceased Madhav Digambar Raiphale, who died on 16/11/2025. The court found that the petitioner satisfied all statutory requirements under the Bombay Regulation 1827, and no objections were raised during the prescribed notice period, making the petitioners Class-I heirs entitled to the heirship certificate and succession benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 392/2025 The court granted Shivam Madhav Raiphale's petition for a heirship certificate, recognizing him and two other heirs (Surekha and Shankar) as legal heirs of the deceased Madhav Digambar Raiphale, who died on 16/11/2025. The court found that the petitioner satisfied all statutory requirements under the Bombay Regulation 1827, and no objections were raised during the prescribed notice period, making the petitioners Class-I heirs entitled to the heirship certificate and succession benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts