Ambadas Omprakash Kamble - E-Filed vs Nill — 352/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA150012982025
e-Filing Number
01-11-2025
Filing Number
576/2025
Filing Date
04-11-2025
Registration No
352/2025
Registration Date
04-11-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ambadas Omprakash Kamble - E-Filed
Adv. SHAIKH DASTGIR PAPAMIYA
Ashwini Urf Dipika W/o Kishor Shinde
Adv. SHAIKH DASTGIR PAPAMIYA
Respondent(s)
Nill
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 14-02-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: M.A. No. 352/2025 The court granted the heirship certificate application filed by Ambadas Omprakash Kamble and Ashwini Urf Dipika (legal heirs of deceased Pornima Machhindra Motherao who died on 13/09/2025). The applicants provided unchallenged evidence including death certificate, Aadhaar and ration cards, and public proclamation published in newspapers without objections from any other claimants. The court found them to be the sole legal heirs entitled to the certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, while clarifying that the heirship certificate is merely formal recognition and does not grant any property rights to the deceased's estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: M.A. No. 352/2025 The court granted the heirship certificate application filed by Ambadas Omprakash Kamble and Ashwini Urf Dipika (legal heirs of deceased Pornima Machhindra Motherao who died on 13/09/2025). The applicants provided unchallenged evidence including death certificate, Aadhaar and ration cards, and public proclamation published in newspapers without objections from any other claimants. The court found them to be the sole legal heirs entitled to the certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, while clarifying that the heirship certificate is merely formal recognition and does not grant any property rights to the deceased's estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts