Ambadas Omprakash Kamble - E-Filed vs Nill — 352/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 24th March 2026.

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHLA150012982025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

01-11-2025

Filing Number

576/2025

Filing Date

04-11-2025

Registration No

352/2025

Registration Date

04-11-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 1

Petitioner(s)

Ambadas Omprakash Kamble - E-Filed

Adv. SHAIKH DASTGIR PAPAMIYA

Ashwini Urf Dipika W/o Kishor Shinde

Adv. SHAIKH DASTGIR PAPAMIYA

Respondent(s)

Nill

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

24-03-2026

Disposed

23-03-2026

Arguments

18-03-2026

Arguments

13-03-2026

Arguments

14-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: M.A. No. 352/2025 The court granted the heirship certificate application filed by Ambadas Omprakash Kamble and Ashwini Urf Dipika (legal heirs of deceased Pornima Machhindra Motherao who died on 13/09/2025). The applicants provided unchallenged evidence including death certificate, Aadhaar and ration cards, and public proclamation published in newspapers without objections from any other claimants. The court found them to be the sole legal heirs entitled to the certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, while clarifying that the heirship certificate is merely formal recognition and does not grant any property rights to the deceased's estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: M.A. No. 352/2025 The court granted the heirship certificate application filed by Ambadas Omprakash Kamble and Ashwini Urf Dipika (legal heirs of deceased Pornima Machhindra Motherao who died on 13/09/2025). The applicants provided unchallenged evidence including death certificate, Aadhaar and ration cards, and public proclamation published in newspapers without objections from any other claimants. The court found them to be the sole legal heirs entitled to the certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827, while clarifying that the heirship certificate is merely formal recognition and does not grant any property rights to the deceased's estate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case