Rajiv S/o Prabhakar Bhalerao vs NIL — 254/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHLA150008462025

e-Filing Number

25-07-2025

Filing Number

398/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

254/2025

Registration Date

28-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajiv S/o Prabhakar Bhalerao

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

  2. 2.Mudrikabai W/o Prabhakar Bhalerao

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

  3. 3.Laxmibai W/o Tatyarao Masure

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

  4. 4.Balika W/o Sopan Kamble

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

  5. 5.Sunil S/o Prabhakar Bhalerao

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

  6. 6.Shakuntala W/o Madhav Waghmare

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

  7. 7.Anil S/o Prabhakar Bhalerao

    Adv. HAKKE DNYANOBA RAOSAHEB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 254/2025 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application for an heirship certificate. The court determined that Rajiv (son of the deceased Prabhakar Bhalerao) and the other listed heirs are legitimate successors under Hindu Succession Law and are entitled to obtain the heirship certificate to facilitate inheritance benefits. Key Reasoning: The deceased died on 27/05/2023, and the court found sufficient documentary and oral evidence establishing the petitioners' relationship to the deceased. Public notice was properly issued without any objections filed during the statutory period, confirming the petitioners' claims as legal heirs under Class-I succession provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  5. 14-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  6. 15-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  8. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  9. 12-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  11. 12-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  12. 08-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Proclomation

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  14. 28-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 254/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 254/2025 Court Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application for an heirship certificate. The court determined that Rajiv (son of the deceased Prabhakar Bhalerao) and the other listed heirs are legitimate successors under Hindu Succession Law and are entitled to obtain the heirship certificate to facilitate inheritance benefits. Key Reasoning: The deceased died on 27/05/2023, and the court found sufficient documentary and oral evidence establishing the petitioners' relationship to the deceased. Public notice was properly issued without any objections filed during the statutory period, confirming the petitioners' claims as legal heirs under Class-I succession provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case