Sumit S/o Shivaji Kasbe vs Bharatbai W/o Shivaji Kasbe and ors 5 Advocate - Nandagawale Bhimashankar B — 165/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA150006462022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
390/2022
Filing Date
14-06-2022
Registration No
165/2022
Registration Date
15-06-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sumit S/o Shivaji Kasbe
Adv. Patil Dhananjay T
Respondent(s)
Bharatbai W/o Shivaji Kasbe and ors 5 Advocate - Nandagawale Bhimashankar B
Shobha W/o Sonerao Landge
Maya W/o Datta Shinde
Anjali W/o Vishwajit Suryawanshi
Divya D/o Shivaji Kasbe
Rajabai W/o Rohidas Kasbe
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 23-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 09-12-2025 | Steps |
| 05-11-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 165/2022 Sumit v. Bharatbai & Ors.5 The court allowed defendants No. 1 and 6's application for condonation of 9 days delay in filing their written statement in this perpetual injunction suit involving immovable property. The court found their reason (unavailability of important documents) satisfactory and permitted them to file the written statement upon payment of Rs. 200 costs to the plaintiff, enabling the suit to proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S No. 165/2022 Sumit v. Bharatbai & Ors.5 The court allowed defendants No. 1 and 6's application for condonation of 9 days delay in filing their written statement in this perpetual injunction suit involving immovable property. The court found their reason (unavailability of important documents) satisfactory and permitted them to file the written statement upon payment of Rs. 200 costs to the plaintiff, enabling the suit to proceed on merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts