State of Maharashtra vs Hiraman @ Pappu Ganpati Kambale Advocate - Sonkamble Rameshwar Kondiba — 161/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354,354 (B),323. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 15th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA150006162023
Filing Number
305/2023
Filing Date
06-06-2023
Registration No
161/2023
Registration Date
06-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Decision Date
15th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
72
Police Station
Chakur Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Hiraman @ Pappu Ganpati Kambale Advocate - Sonkamble Rameshwar Kondiba
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 29-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted the accused Hiraman @ Pappu Ganpati Kambale of charges under IPC sections 354, 354-B, and 323, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the alleged offenses of outraging modesty and voluntarily causing hurt. The court noted that witness testimony was contradictory and insufficient to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the alleged physical assault and tearing of clothing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted the accused Hiraman @ Pappu Ganpati Kambale of charges under IPC sections 354, 354-B, and 323, finding that the prosecution failed to prove the alleged offenses of outraging modesty and voluntarily causing hurt. The court noted that witness testimony was contradictory and insufficient to establish the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, particularly regarding the alleged physical assault and tearing of clothing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts