State Excise Chakur Beat No. 2 vs Dhanaji Ramchandra Kamble — 173/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA150005812025

Filing Number

297/2025

Filing Date

21-May-2025

Registration No

173/2025

Registration Date

21-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur

Judge

3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65-E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise Chakur Beat No. 2

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dhanaji Ramchandra Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Dhanaji Ramchandra Kamble under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Liquor Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the prosecution's failure to secure his presence and absence of a Competent Authority report. Bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials directed to the Excise office for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  5. 14-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  6. 01-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  7. 28-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

  8. 30-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 21-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Dhanaji Ramchandra Kamble under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Liquor Act and stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to the prosecution's failure to secure his presence and absence of a Competent Authority report. Bail bonds were cancelled and seized materials directed to the Excise office for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case