Saudagar Motiram Shedule vs Ravindra Dnyanoba Mandumale Advocate - Jawade Mangaldas G — 88/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA150005642024

Evidence

Next Hearing

09th July 2026

e-Filing Number

20-05-2024

Filing Number

262/2024

Filing Date

29-05-2024

Registration No

88/2024

Registration Date

31-05-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

FIR Details

Police Station

Chakur Police Station

Year

0

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Saudagar Motiram Shedule

Adv. PANDURANG S BUNDRALE

Respondent(s)

Ravindra Dnyanoba Mandumale Advocate - Jawade Mangaldas G

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

09-05-2026

Evidence

18-04-2026

Evidence

13-03-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

05-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

10-02-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case 88/2024 Summary: The accused filed an application under Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. seeking production of loan transaction information from the Sub Registrar Co-operative society Ltd. Chakur regarding Swaraj Finance loans from 2018-2019. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, finding that the accused failed to establish the relevance of the requested documents and appeared to be using it to delay proceedings, particularly the pending cross-examination of the complainant that has been stalled since November 13, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 88/2024 Summary: The accused filed an application under Section 91 of the Cr.P.C. seeking production of loan transaction information from the Sub Registrar Co-operative society Ltd. Chakur regarding Swaraj Finance loans from 2018-2019. The Judicial Magistrate rejected the application, finding that the accused failed to establish the relevance of the requested documents and appeared to be using it to delay proceedings, particularly the pending cross-examination of the complainant that has been stalled since November 13, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case