Madhukar Rangrao Jahagirdar and 4 vs Bhimashankar Balaji Mokashi Jahagirdar and 3 Advocate - Waghmare Satish D — 104/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA150004692019

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

287/2019

Filing Date

13-06-2019

Registration No

104/2019

Registration Date

13-06-2019

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 2

Petitioner(s)

Madhukar Rangrao Jahagirdar and 4

Adv. Nandagawale Bhimashankar B

Sow.Suratbai Madhukar Jahagirdar

Manoj Dattatrya Jahagirdar

Shriyash Dattatrya Jahagirdar 3 and 4 u/g of his real father Dattatrya Madhukar Jahagirdar

Rangrao Shrinivas Jahagirdar u/g of his real father Shrinivas Madhukar Jahagirdar

Respondent(s)

Bhimashankar Balaji Mokashi Jahagirdar and 3 Advocate - Waghmare Satish D

Shivshankar Balaji Mokashi Jahagirdar

Eknath Balaji Mokashi Jahagirdar

Smt.Padminbai Balaji Mokashi Jahagirdar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur

07-05-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

12-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

08-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

16-09-2022
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 104/2019 Outcome: The court allowed the temporary injunction application filed by plaintiffs Madhukar Rangrao Jahagirdar and others. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the suit land (Field Gat No. 166, village Kalkoti) until the final decision of the suit. Key Findings: The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case of ownership and possession based on revenue documents (7/12 extracts and registered sale deed), the balance of convenience favored plaintiffs, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Defendants' objections regarding lack of jurisdiction and invalid partition were rejected as premature for this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 104/2019 Outcome: The court allowed the temporary injunction application filed by plaintiffs Madhukar Rangrao Jahagirdar and others. The defendants are hereby restrained from interfering with or obstructing the suit land (Field Gat No. 166, village Kalkoti) until the final decision of the suit. Key Findings: The court found that plaintiffs established a prima facie case of ownership and possession based on revenue documents (7/12 extracts and registered sale deed), the balance of convenience favored plaintiffs, and irreparable loss would result without the injunction. Defendants' objections regarding lack of jurisdiction and invalid partition were rejected as premature for this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case