Devidas Ramrao Gaikwad vs Panchaphula Sakharam Pharkande Advocate - Khandekar Keshav M — 1700052/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,471,465,34. Status: Evidence Before Charge. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA150002232013
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1700052/2013
Filing Date
10-06-2013
Registration No
1700052/2013
Registration Date
10-06-2013
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devidas Ramrao Gaikwad
Adv. Badde Nagnath B
Respondent(s)
Panchaphula Sakharam Pharkande Advocate - Khandekar Keshav M
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Jt. Civil Judge J. D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
Evidence Before Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 02-02-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
| 31-01-2026 | Evidence Before Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1700052/2013 Petitioner: Devidas Ramrao Gaikwad (83-year-old retired person) Respondent: Panchaphula Sakharam Pharkande Advocate - Keshav M. Khandekar Outcome: Case adjourned. The petitioner testified as witness #1, providing sworn testimony detailing his RTI (Right to Information) applications filed with multiple primary health centers and government offices in Latur district. The witness testified about documents received from various medical officers regarding health center operations, security schemes, procurement records, and related inquiries. The court admitted multiple documents (marked as exhibits 74-87) and adjourned the cross-examination to a subsequent date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1700052/2013 Petitioner: Devidas Ramrao Gaikwad (83-year-old retired person) Respondent: Panchaphula Sakharam Pharkande Advocate - Keshav M. Khandekar Outcome: Case adjourned. The petitioner testified as witness #1, providing sworn testimony detailing his RTI (Right to Information) applications filed with multiple primary health centers and government offices in Latur district. The witness testified about documents received from various medical officers regarding health center operations, security schemes, procurement records, and related inquiries. The court admitted multiple documents (marked as exhibits 74-87) and adjourned the cross-examination to a subsequent date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts