Mashna Ramrao Kundgir vs Shakuntala Ankush Kundgir Advocate - Kulkarni S. S. — 1700054/2010
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA150002142010
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
1700054/2010
Filing Date
14-06-2010
Registration No
1700054/2010
Registration Date
15-06-2010
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mashna Ramrao Kundgir
Adv. Badde Nagnath B
Pandurang Ramrao Kundgir
Meenabai Sadashiv Kundgir
Sambhaji Sadashiv Kundgir
Shankar Sadashiv Kundgir Pltiff No.4,5 ug mother plaintiff no.3 Meenabai Sadashiv Kundgir
Adv. Kulkarni Ankush L
Respondent(s)
Shakuntala Ankush Kundgir Advocate - Kulkarni S. S.
Ankush Ramrao Kundgir
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 10-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Mashna Ramrao Kundgir v. Shakuntala Ankush Kundgir (RCS 54/2010) Outcome: The court allowed defendant no.1's application to set aside the "no evidence" order dated 19.07.2019, granting her one final opportunity to present evidence. However, the application was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 2,000 in costs plus any remaining costs from rejected adjournment applications, to be paid to the plaintiffs before the next hearing date. The defendant was strictly directed not to seek further adjournments, with forfeiture of her evidence as consequence for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Mashna Ramrao Kundgir v. Shakuntala Ankush Kundgir (RCS 54/2010) Outcome: The court allowed defendant no.1's application to set aside the "no evidence" order dated 19.07.2019, granting her one final opportunity to present evidence. However, the application was allowed subject to payment of Rs. 2,000 in costs plus any remaining costs from rejected adjournment applications, to be paid to the plaintiffs before the next hearing date. The defendant was strictly directed not to seek further adjournments, with forfeiture of her evidence as consequence for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts