P.S.Chakur. vs Babu s/o Manik Jakkalwad And Oths. 1 Advocate - Somwanshi Prakash V — 25/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,336,34. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA150001962019
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
71/2019
Filing Date
07-03-2019
Registration No
25/2019
Registration Date
07-03-2019
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S.Chakur.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Babu s/o Manik Jakkalwad And Oths. 1 Advocate - Somwanshi Prakash V
Krushana s/o Madhav Ghume
Adv. Somwanshi Prakash V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 17-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Criminal Case 25/2019, the court recorded testimony from a State Transport Corporation bus driver (Vishnudas Narasimha Shrimangle) regarding a vehicle collision that occurred on December 30, 2018, near Chapolli. The driver testified that a truck collided with his bus, causing approximately ₹25,000 in damage. After cross-examination by the accused's advocate, the witness maintained his account of the accident. The court accepted the examination-in-chief statement on January 6, 2026, and did not allow further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Criminal Case 25/2019, the court recorded testimony from a State Transport Corporation bus driver (Vishnudas Narasimha Shrimangle) regarding a vehicle collision that occurred on December 30, 2018, near Chapolli. The driver testified that a truck collided with his bus, causing approximately ₹25,000 in damage. After cross-examination by the accused's advocate, the witness maintained his account of the accident. The court accepted the examination-in-chief statement on January 6, 2026, and did not allow further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts