Shahebaj So Yunus Kureshi - E - Filed vs state Maharashatra — 10/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section Setion 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 07th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA150001802026
e-Filing Number
14-02-2026
Filing Number
97/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
Police Station
Chakur Police Station
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahebaj So Yunus Kureshi - E - Filed
Adv. SHAIKH FARUKH VALLISAB
Respondent(s)
state Maharashatra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 27-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Shahebaj v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 10/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Bolero Pickup vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner and not the accused in the animal cruelty case. However, the court held the vehicle owner jointly and severally liable under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Rules 2017 for maintenance costs of the two bulls seized from the vehicle, fixed at Rs. 200 per bull per day. The vehicle was released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 4,50,000 with conditions that the applicant pay all animal maintenance costs, not alienate the property, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Shahebaj v. State of Maharashtra (Cri. M.A. No. 10/2026) The court allowed the applicant's petition for interim custody of a seized Mahindra Bolero Pickup vehicle, finding him to be the registered owner and not the accused in the animal cruelty case. However, the court held the vehicle owner jointly and severally liable under Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Rules 2017 for maintenance costs of the two bulls seized from the vehicle, fixed at Rs. 200 per bull per day. The vehicle was released on an indemnity bond of Rs. 4,50,000 with conditions that the applicant pay all animal maintenance costs, not alienate the property, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts