Devendra Gagaprasad Pande Died vs The Chief Executive Officer Z.p. Latur Advocate - Gaikwad Angad V — 1700467/2002
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7RULE1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA150001782001
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
1700467/2002
Filing Date
30-10-2001
Registration No
1700467/2002
Registration Date
09-11-2001
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devendra Gagaprasad Pande Died
Adv. Shivpurkar Suhash D
Smt. Pushpa Wo Devendra Pande,
Rajesh So Devendra Pande
Adv. S.D. shivpurkar
Mukesh So Devendra Pande
Adv. S.D. shivpurkar
Sow. Manju Wo Rajendraprasad Dube
Adv. S.D. shivpurkar
Deepa Wo Kishor Pardeshi
Adv. S.D. shivpurkar
Sow. Roopa Rajkishor Dube
Adv. Shivpurkar Suhash D
Sow. Swaroopa Kishor Dube
Adv. S.D. shivpurkar
Respondent(s)
The Chief Executive Officer Z.p. Latur Advocate - Gaikwad Angad V
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 22-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 467/2002 – Devendra & ors. Vs. Z.P. Latur The defendant's application to set aside a "no cross" order dated 17.11.2018 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate's absence caused the procedural order, the defendant's valuable rights were at stake in the declaration and injunction suit, warranting an opportunity to present his case. The no cross order was set aside, subject to the defendant paying costs of Rs. 500 to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 467/2002 – Devendra & ors. Vs. Z.P. Latur The defendant's application to set aside a "no cross" order dated 17.11.2018 was allowed. The court found that while the defendant's advocate's absence caused the procedural order, the defendant's valuable rights were at stake in the declaration and injunction suit, warranting an opportunity to present his case. The no cross order was set aside, subject to the defendant paying costs of Rs. 500 to the plaintiffs as penalty for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts