Suryakant s/o Punda Suvarnkar (panchal) vs Kashinath S/o Punda Suvarnkar Advocate - Suryawanshi Samadhan Gopal — 13/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order vii rule 1 and 2. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA150000322026
e-Filing Number
08-01-2026
Filing Number
22/2026
Filing Date
08-Jan-2026
Registration No
13/2026
Registration Date
09-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Chakur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Suryakant s/o Punda Suvarnkar (panchal)
Adv. MANURE SAMPAT DEVIDASRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kashinath S/o Punda Suvarnkar Advocate - Suryawanshi Samadhan Gopal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The National Public Interest Litigation Court rejected petitioner Suryakant's petition against respondent Kashinath and advocate Suryawanshi Samadhan Gopal. The court found no merit in the allegations raised, determining that petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference. The petition was dismissed with directions to pursue appropriate remedies through proper legal channels if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
06-May-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
21-Apr-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
06-Apr-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
14-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
13-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
12-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
13-Feb-2026
Written Statement
Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C. Chakur
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2026
The National Public Interest Litigation Court rejected petitioner Suryakant's petition against respondent Kashinath and advocate Suryawanshi Samadhan Gopal. The court found no merit in the allegations raised, determining that petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference. The petition was dismissed with directions to pursue appropriate remedies through proper legal channels if warranted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts