State of Maharashtra vs Nagesh Nilkanth Haralkar and other — 696/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140037482023

Filing Number

1617/2023

Filing Date

02-Dec-2023

Registration No

696/2023

Registration Date

02-Dec-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

297

Police Station

Police StationKillari.

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nagesh Nilkanth Haralkar and other

  2. 2.Minakashi @ Meena Nilkanth Haralkar

  3. 3.Nilkanth Shesherao Haralkar

  4. 4.Neha Nilkanth Harlkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Nagesh Nilkanth Haralkar (RCC 696/2023) The court acquitted all four accused of dowry harassment, physical assault, criminal intimidation, and insult charges under IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 506. The complainant-wife and her father (key prosecution witnesses) denied the allegations during testimony and confirmed they had settled their matrimonial dispute out of court, with neither party wishing to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  9. 11-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  10. 03-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  11. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  15. 30-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  16. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  17. 08-May-2025

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  18. 03-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  19. 17-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  20. 24-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  21. 26-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  22. 22-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  23. 11-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  24. 04-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  25. 20-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  26. 14-Aug-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  27. 04-Jun-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  28. 26-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  29. 22-Dec-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  30. 02-Dec-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 696/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Nagesh Nilkanth Haralkar (RCC 696/2023) The court acquitted all four accused of dowry harassment, physical assault, criminal intimidation, and insult charges under IPC Sections 498(A), 323, 504, 506. The complainant-wife and her father (key prosecution witnesses) denied the allegations during testimony and confirmed they had settled their matrimonial dispute out of court, with neither party wishing to proceed with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case