State of Maharashtra vs Ateeq Iqbal Shaikh — 1351/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140036672024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1514/2024

Filing Date

24-12-2024

Registration No

1351/2024

Registration Date

24-12-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ateeq Iqbal Shaikh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

13-03-2026

Disposed

11-02-2026

Appearance

17-11-2025

Appearance

24-07-2025

Appearance

24-04-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ateeq Iqbal Shaikh (1351/2024) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC against the accused charged under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite ample opportunities, the accused was repeatedly absent, prosecution failed to secure witness presence, no Chargesheet Analysis report was filed, and the summary matter had been pending over a year, making further trial futile. The accused was released with bail and surety discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Ateeq Iqbal Shaikh (1351/2024) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC against the accused charged under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that despite ample opportunities, the accused was repeatedly absent, prosecution failed to secure witness presence, no Chargesheet Analysis report was filed, and the summary matter had been pending over a year, making further trial futile. The accused was released with bail and surety discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case