State of Maharashtra vs Pravin Papaji Rathod — 1270/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140034942024

Filing Number

1431/2024

Filing Date

11-Dec-2024

Registration No

1270/2024

Registration Date

11-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

06

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pravin Papaji Rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the case against accused Pravin Papaji Rathod under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to prolonged pendency (over one year), the accused's non-appearance, and the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence or file the Chargeability (C.A.) report despite multiple opportunities. The accused was released, all bail bonds discharged, and seized property ordered to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 06-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 07-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 07-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 01-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  9. 14-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 11-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1270/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the case against accused Pravin Papaji Rathod under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure due to prolonged pendency (over one year), the accused's non-appearance, and the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence or file the Chargeability (C.A.) report despite multiple opportunities. The accused was released, all bail bonds discharged, and seized property ordered to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case