State Of Maharashtra vs Balaji Ram Kamble — 1252/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140034322024

Filing Number

1409/2024

Filing Date

05-Dec-2024

Registration No

1252/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

453

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balaji Ram Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Balaji Ram Kamble under Section 258 CrPC for an offence under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution had failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities and the accused was absent, making further trial futile. The accused was released, bail discharged, and seized articles ordered disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 11-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 21-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 17-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  9. 17-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 05-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1252/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Balaji Ram Kamble under Section 258 CrPC for an offence under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the prosecution had failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities and the accused was absent, making further trial futile. The accused was released, bail discharged, and seized articles ordered disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case