State Of Maharashtra vs Ram Balaji Kadam (Patil) — 1250/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140034302024

Filing Number

1407/2024

Filing Date

05-Dec-2024

Registration No

1250/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

480

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ram Balaji Kadam (Patil)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: State v. Ram Balaji Kadam (1250/2024) The court discharged the accused Ram Balaji Kadam from a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e) offense by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The proceedings were terminated due to the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and take further steps despite ample opportunities over more than one year, rendering continued trial futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 14-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 27-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 16-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 17-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  9. 17-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 05-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1250/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State v. Ram Balaji Kadam (1250/2024) The court discharged the accused Ram Balaji Kadam from a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e) offense by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The proceedings were terminated due to the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and take further steps despite ample opportunities over more than one year, rendering continued trial futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case