State Of Maharashtra vs Dhanaji Manohar Jadhav — 1238/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140034112024
Filing Number
1398/2024
Filing Date
04-12-2024
Registration No
1238/2024
Registration Date
04-12-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
0011
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Dhanaji Manohar Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-12-2025 | Appearance |
| 30-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 14-07-2025 | Appearance |
| 11-04-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State Of Maharashtra v. Dhanaji Manohar Jadhav (1238/2024) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against Dhanaji Manohar Jadhav, who was charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the trial futile due to the accused's consistent non-appearance, prosecution's failure to secure witness attendance despite multiple opportunities, and the missing Complaint Analysis report after over one year of pendency. The accused was released, bail/surety discharged, and seized materials to be disposed per procedure after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State Of Maharashtra v. Dhanaji Manohar Jadhav (1238/2024) The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against Dhanaji Manohar Jadhav, who was charged under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found the trial futile due to the accused's consistent non-appearance, prosecution's failure to secure witness attendance despite multiple opportunities, and the missing Complaint Analysis report after over one year of pendency. The accused was released, bail/surety discharged, and seized materials to be disposed per procedure after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts