State Of Maharashtra vs Sandip Shivaji Jadhav — 1237/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140034102024

Filing Number

1397/2024

Filing Date

04-Dec-2024

Registration No

1237/2024

Registration Date

04-Dec-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0001

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sandip Shivaji Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Sandip Shivaji Jadhav under Section 258 CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, citing the accused's continued absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and over one year of pending trial without a Chargesheet Analyst report. The accused was released, bail bonds discharged, and seized material ordered for disposal post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 22-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 30-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 14-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 11-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 16-Jan-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 04-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1237/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Sandip Shivaji Jadhav under Section 258 CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, citing the accused's continued absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and over one year of pending trial without a Chargesheet Analyst report. The accused was released, bail bonds discharged, and seized material ordered for disposal post-appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case