State Of Maharashtra vs Shrimant Premnath Kamble — 1223/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140033672024
Filing Number
1386/2024
Filing Date
29-Nov-2024
Registration No
1223/2024
Registration Date
29-Nov-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
357
Police Station
Police StationKillari.
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shrimant Premnath Kamble
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings against accused Shrimant Premnath Kamble under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and discharged him from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The discharge was justified because the critical chemical analysis report was not filed, making conviction impossible even after a full trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
09-Mar-2026
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
09-Dec-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
18-Aug-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
17-Jun-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
28-Mar-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
06-Jan-2025
Appearance
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
04-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1223/2024
The court stopped proceedings against accused Shrimant Premnath Kamble under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and discharged him from charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The discharge was justified because the critical chemical analysis report was not filed, making conviction impossible even after a full trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts