State Of Maharashtra vs Mahadev Netaji Jagtap — 1214/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140033252024

Filing Number

1361/2024

Filing Date

28-Nov-2024

Registration No

1214/2024

Registration Date

28-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

455

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev Netaji Jagtap

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mahadev Netaji Jagtap (1214/2024) The court discharged Mahadev Netaji Jagtap by invoking Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings for a Maharashtra Prohibition Act offense under Section 65(a)(e). The court found the prosecution had failed to take further steps, secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and the accused was absent, making continued trial futile after over one year of pendency. The accused was released and all bail bonds discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 17-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 22-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 20-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 20-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 24-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1214/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mahadev Netaji Jagtap (1214/2024) The court discharged Mahadev Netaji Jagtap by invoking Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings for a Maharashtra Prohibition Act offense under Section 65(a)(e). The court found the prosecution had failed to take further steps, secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and the accused was absent, making continued trial futile after over one year of pendency. The accused was released and all bail bonds discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case