State Of Maharashtra vs Hanmant Ramrao Gaikwad — 1213/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140033242024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1360/2024

Filing Date

28-11-2024

Registration No

1213/2024

Registration Date

28-11-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

427

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Hanmant Ramrao Gaikwad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

13-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

20-12-2025

Appearance

20-09-2025

Appearance

20-06-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court dismissed proceedings against accused Hanmant Ramrao Gaikwad under Section 258 CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e) offense). The court found the prosecution had failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities and the accused was absent, making further trial futile; with the case pending over one year as a summary matter, continuing was deemed purposeless. The accused was released, bail bonds discharged, and seized articles to be disposed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed proceedings against accused Hanmant Ramrao Gaikwad under Section 258 CrPC in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(a)(e) offense). The court found the prosecution had failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities and the accused was absent, making further trial futile; with the case pending over one year as a summary matter, continuing was deemed purposeless. The accused was released, bail bonds discharged, and seized articles to be disposed after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case