State Of Maharashtra vs Datta Abhiman Jadhav — 1212/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140033232024
Filing Number
1359/2024
Filing Date
28-11-2024
Registration No
1212/2024
Registration Date
28-11-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
428
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Datta Abhiman Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | Appearance |
| 20-12-2025 | Appearance |
| 20-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 20-06-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Datta Abhiman Jadhav (1212/2024) The court dismissed the prosecution proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against accused Datta Abhiman Jadhav for offenses under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities and the accused was absent from proceedings, making further trial futile. Given the case's pending status since 2024 and the High Court's case management directives, the court released the accused, discharged bail bonds, and ordered disposal of seized materials after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Datta Abhiman Jadhav (1212/2024) The court dismissed the prosecution proceedings under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against accused Datta Abhiman Jadhav for offenses under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities and the accused was absent from proceedings, making further trial futile. Given the case's pending status since 2024 and the High Court's case management directives, the court released the accused, discharged bail bonds, and ordered disposal of seized materials after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts