BNC POWER PROJECT SHARAD PRALHAD SHEGAONKAR vs state of Maharashtra — 202/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA140032002025
e-Filing Number
17-10-2025
Filing Number
1452/2025
Filing Date
31-Oct-2025
Registration No
202/2025
Registration Date
01-Nov-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
401
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BNC POWER PROJECT SHARAD PRALHAD SHEGAONKAR
Adv. ADV TAUSIF BASHIR SAYYAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.state of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Ausa Judicial Magistrate dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Application 202/2025 filed by BNC Power Project Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra for want of taking steps. The applicant and its advocate were repeatedly absent despite sufficient opportunities and multiple hearings over more than one year, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the case, warranting dismissal under the High Court's action plan for pendency management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
20-Feb-2026
Steps
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
05-Jan-2026
Steps
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
10-Dec-2025
Steps
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
26-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
18-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
14-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
11-Nov-2025
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
07-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 202/2025
The Ausa Judicial Magistrate dismissed Criminal Miscellaneous Application 202/2025 filed by BNC Power Project Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra for want of taking steps. The applicant and its advocate were repeatedly absent despite sufficient opportunities and multiple hearings over more than one year, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the case, warranting dismissal under the High Court's action plan for pendency management. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts