Sunanda Baswaraj Kevalram vs Jayraj Gurpadappa Kevalram — 773/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7rule1and2. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA140031932025
e-Filing Number
30-10-2025
Filing Number
1754/2025
Filing Date
30-Oct-2025
Registration No
773/2025
Registration Date
31-Oct-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sunanda Baswaraj Kevalram
Adv. ASHTURE VIJAKUMAR BABUAPPA
-
2.Mallinath Baswaraj Kevalram
Adv. ASHTURE VIJAKUMAR BABUAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Jayraj Gurpadappa Kevalram
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Lokadalat (Legal Services Authority) settled the dispute between Sunanda Baswaraj Kevalram and Mallinath Baswaraj Kevalram against Jayraj Gurpadappa Kevalram through a compromise agreement, with the award limited to injunction relief only. The court ordered the compromise (Exhibit 12) to form part of the award, refunded court fees to the plaintiffs, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
13-Mar-2026
Compromise
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
12-Mar-2026
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
06-Feb-2026
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
13-Jan-2026
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
13-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
06-Dec-2025
Ex-Parte Order
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
01-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 773/2025
The Lokadalat (Legal Services Authority) settled the dispute between Sunanda Baswaraj Kevalram and Mallinath Baswaraj Kevalram against Jayraj Gurpadappa Kevalram through a compromise agreement, with the award limited to injunction relief only. The court ordered the compromise (Exhibit 12) to form part of the award, refunded court fees to the plaintiffs, and made no order regarding costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts