State of Maharashtra vs Appasaheb Bhimrao Kambale and oth. 04 Advocate - More Sushilkumar S — 525/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140030722024

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

1269/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

525/2024

Registration Date

22-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

FIR Details

FIR Number

346

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 85,115(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Appasaheb Bhimrao Kambale and oth. 04 Advocate - More Sushilkumar S

Bhirao Sopan Kamble

Sau. Vandana Bhimrao Kamble

Vilas Bhimrao Kamble

Rohit Bhimrao Kamble

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

21-05-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

28-04-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

13-03-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

09-02-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

05-01-2026

Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

Interim Orders

30-07-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary of R.C.C. No. 525/2024 The court allowed the application and permitted accused Rohit Bhimrao Kamble to travel to Indonesia (Bali) from August 20 to September 20, 2025 for a bank-organized event. The permission was granted conditionally, requiring him to submit travel details (itinerary and accommodation), give an undertaking not to challenge his identity, and ensure his absence does not affect case hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of R.C.C. No. 525/2024 The court allowed the application and permitted accused Rohit Bhimrao Kamble to travel to Indonesia (Bali) from August 20 to September 20, 2025 for a bank-organized event. The permission was granted conditionally, requiring him to submit travel details (itinerary and accommodation), give an undertaking not to challenge his identity, and ensure his absence does not affect case hearings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case