State of Maharashtra vs Ramdhan Namdev Jadhav and oth. — 1045/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140029852024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1223/2024

Filing Date

09-10-2024

Registration No

1045/2024

Registration Date

09-10-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

162

Police Station

Police StationBhada.

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 123
MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(F)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Ramdhan Namdev Jadhav and oth.

Ravikant Bharat Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

13-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Appearance

10-03-2026

Appearance

24-02-2026

Appearance

09-12-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Ramdhan Namdev Jadhav, who was facing trial under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, after the prosecution failed to produce the required Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report despite court direction. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stop proceedings, finding it unjust to keep the matter pending indefinitely without the essential evidence, and ordered seizure disposal and cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused Ramdhan Namdev Jadhav, who was facing trial under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, after the prosecution failed to produce the required Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report despite court direction. The court invoked Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code to stop proceedings, finding it unjust to keep the matter pending indefinitely without the essential evidence, and ordered seizure disposal and cancellation of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case