Ajitkumar Sugriv Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP — 188/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA140028902025
e-Filing Number
25-09-2025
Filing Number
1289/2025
Filing Date
25-09-2025
Registration No
188/2025
Registration Date
25-09-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajitkumar Sugriv Jadhav
Adv. SACHIN BHAURAO CHAVAN
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Police Inspector
Branch Manager
Rajesh Jamur
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 28-11-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 17-10-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 29-09-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 188/2025 Summary: The Ausa Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Ajitkumar against the State of Maharashtra for want of taking steps. The court found that the complaint had been pending for over one year, with the complainant and his advocate repeatedly absent despite sufficient opportunities and multiple court calls, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 188/2025 Summary: The Ausa Judicial Magistrate dismissed the criminal complaint filed by Ajitkumar against the State of Maharashtra for want of taking steps. The court found that the complaint had been pending for over one year, with the complainant and his advocate repeatedly absent despite sufficient opportunities and multiple court calls, demonstrating lack of interest in proceeding with the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts