State of Maharashtra vs Bahadur Sayyadsab Sayyad — 922/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140028572024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1184/2024

Filing Date

24-09-2024

Registration No

922/2024

Registration Date

24-09-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

359

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(A)(E)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Bahadur Sayyadsab Sayyad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

13-03-2026

Disposed

22-12-2025

Appearance

25-09-2025

Appearance

01-07-2025

Appearance

11-03-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: State v. Bahadur (922/2024) The court discontinued proceedings against accused Bahadur under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and witness attendance despite multiple opportunities, making further trial futile. Given the case's pending status for over one year and the High Court's action plan for case disposal, the court released the accused, discharged bail bonds, and ordered seized material's disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State v. Bahadur (922/2024) The court discontinued proceedings against accused Bahadur under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and witness attendance despite multiple opportunities, making further trial futile. Given the case's pending status for over one year and the High Court's action plan for case disposal, the court released the accused, discharged bail bonds, and ordered seized material's disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case