State of Maharashtra vs Bahadur Sayyadsab Sayyad — 922/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(A)(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140028572024
Filing Number
1184/2024
Filing Date
24-09-2024
Registration No
922/2024
Registration Date
24-09-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
359
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Bahadur Sayyadsab Sayyad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 22-12-2025 | Appearance |
| 25-09-2025 | Appearance |
| 01-07-2025 | Appearance |
| 11-03-2025 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: State v. Bahadur (922/2024) The court discontinued proceedings against accused Bahadur under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and witness attendance despite multiple opportunities, making further trial futile. Given the case's pending status for over one year and the High Court's action plan for case disposal, the court released the accused, discharged bail bonds, and ordered seized material's disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: State v. Bahadur (922/2024) The court discontinued proceedings against accused Bahadur under Section 258 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for an offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and witness attendance despite multiple opportunities, making further trial futile. Given the case's pending status for over one year and the High Court's action plan for case disposal, the court released the accused, discharged bail bonds, and ordered seized material's disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts