State of Maharashtra vs Fataru Mahebub Shaikh — 828/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (A)(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140025902024

Filing Number

1098/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

828/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

320

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 (A)(E)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Fataru Mahebub Shaikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed proceedings against Fataru Mahebub Shaikh under Section 258 CrPC for an offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, due to the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and the accused's non-appearance despite multiple opportunities over one year. The accused was released, bail discharged, and seized materials ordered to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 16-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 23-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 02-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 26-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 31-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  9. 30-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 828/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed proceedings against Fataru Mahebub Shaikh under Section 258 CrPC for an offense under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, due to the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and the accused's non-appearance despite multiple opportunities over one year. The accused was released, bail discharged, and seized materials ordered to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case