State of Maharashtra vs Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav — 1115/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140025412025

Filing Number

1132/2025

Filing Date

26-Aug-2025

Registration No

1115/2025

Registration Date

26-Aug-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

222

Police Station

Police StationKillari.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, finding the case unviable due to the missing chemical analysis report—essential for conviction. Seized liquor and bag were ordered handed to the State Excise Department for disposal after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  5. 14-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  6. 02-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1115/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, finding the case unviable due to the missing chemical analysis report—essential for conviction. Seized liquor and bag were ordered handed to the State Excise Department for disposal after appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case