State Of Maharashtra vs Laxman Balaji Surwase — 643/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 a e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140023832024

Filing Number

990/2024

Filing Date

02-Aug-2024

Registration No

643/2024

Registration Date

02-Aug-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

231

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65 a e

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Laxman Balaji Surwase

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court dismissed the prosecution case against Laxman Balaji Surwase under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 CrPC, finding the prosecution had failed to take further steps, secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and keep the accused present over more than a year. The accused was released, seized evidence to be disposed after the appeal period, and bail bonds discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  4. 21-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  6. 25-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  7. 30-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  8. 25-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  9. 20-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  10. 18-Sep-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 02-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 643/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the prosecution case against Laxman Balaji Surwase under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 CrPC, finding the prosecution had failed to take further steps, secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and keep the accused present over more than a year. The accused was released, seized evidence to be disposed after the appeal period, and bail bonds discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case