State Of Maharashtra vs Tohid Khayum Shaikh and Oth. — 639/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140023772024

Case disposed

Filing Number

986/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

639/2024

Registration Date

02-08-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

08th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

37

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Tohid Khayum Shaikh and Oth.

Baburao Annarao Patil

Klim Shabbir Shaikh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

08-05-2026

Disposed

07-05-2026

Awaiting Summons

24-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

10-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

08-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Judicial Magistrate at Ausa discontinued proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Maharashtra Gambling Act case against Tohid Khayum Shaikh and others, citing the accused's persistent absence despite multiple opportunities and the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence. The court found further trial futile and ordered release of the accused with cancellation of bail bonds, disposal of seized property after the appeal period, and crediting Rs. 563 seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate at Ausa discontinued proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Maharashtra Gambling Act case against Tohid Khayum Shaikh and others, citing the accused's persistent absence despite multiple opportunities and the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence. The court found further trial futile and ordered release of the accused with cancellation of bail bonds, disposal of seized property after the appeal period, and crediting Rs. 563 seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case