State Of Maharashtra vs Tohid Khayum Shaikh and Oth. — 639/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 08th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140023772024
Filing Number
986/2024
Filing Date
02-08-2024
Registration No
639/2024
Registration Date
02-08-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
37
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tohid Khayum Shaikh and Oth.
Baburao Annarao Patil
Klim Shabbir Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 24-04-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Judicial Magistrate at Ausa discontinued proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Maharashtra Gambling Act case against Tohid Khayum Shaikh and others, citing the accused's persistent absence despite multiple opportunities and the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence. The court found further trial futile and ordered release of the accused with cancellation of bail bonds, disposal of seized property after the appeal period, and crediting Rs. 563 seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Judicial Magistrate at Ausa discontinued proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code in this Maharashtra Gambling Act case against Tohid Khayum Shaikh and others, citing the accused's persistent absence despite multiple opportunities and the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence. The court found further trial futile and ordered release of the accused with cancellation of bail bonds, disposal of seized property after the appeal period, and crediting Rs. 563 seized cash to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts