State OF Maharashtra vs Aakash Gagngadhar Telang — 638/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140023752024
Filing Number
985/2024
Filing Date
02-Aug-2024
Registration No
638/2024
Registration Date
02-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State OF Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Aakash Gagngadhar Telang
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary (SCC 638/2024): The court dismissed proceedings against Akash Gangadhar Telang under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 CrPC. The magistrate found that continuing the trial was futile due to the accused's absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, missing Complaint Analysis (C.A.) report, and the case pending for over one year. The accused was released and all bail bonds discharged; seized materials to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
21-Feb-2026
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
20-Dec-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
24-Sep-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
27-Jun-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
25-Mar-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
31-Dec-2024
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
11-Oct-2024
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
13-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 638/2024
Case Summary (SCC 638/2024): The court dismissed proceedings against Akash Gangadhar Telang under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 CrPC. The magistrate found that continuing the trial was futile due to the accused's absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, missing Complaint Analysis (C.A.) report, and the case pending for over one year. The accused was released and all bail bonds discharged; seized materials to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts