State OF Maharashtra vs Aakash Gagngadhar Telang — 638/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140023752024

Case disposed

Filing Number

985/2024

Filing Date

02-08-2024

Registration No

638/2024

Registration Date

02-08-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

67

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65e

Petitioner(s)

State OF Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Aakash Gagngadhar Telang

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

13-03-2026

Disposed

21-02-2026

Appearance

20-12-2025

Appearance

24-09-2025

Appearance

27-06-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary (SCC 638/2024): The court dismissed proceedings against Akash Gangadhar Telang under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 CrPC. The magistrate found that continuing the trial was futile due to the accused's absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, missing Complaint Analysis (C.A.) report, and the case pending for over one year. The accused was released and all bail bonds discharged; seized materials to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (SCC 638/2024): The court dismissed proceedings against Akash Gangadhar Telang under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, invoking Section 258 CrPC. The magistrate found that continuing the trial was futile due to the accused's absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, missing Complaint Analysis (C.A.) report, and the case pending for over one year. The accused was released and all bail bonds discharged; seized materials to be disposed after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case