State Of Maharashtra vs Hanmant Vyankappa Surwase — 506/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140022392024

Case disposed

Filing Number

928/2024

Filing Date

23-07-2024

Registration No

506/2024

Registration Date

23-07-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

221

Police Station

Police Station Ausa

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(a),65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Hanmant Vyankappa Surwase

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa

13-03-2026

Disposed

02-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

15-10-2025

Appearance

21-07-2025

Appearance

08-04-2025

Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Hanmant Vyankappa Surwase (506/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to prosecution's failure to advance the case for over a year. The accused was absent from proceedings, prosecution failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and continuing the trial was deemed futile. The accused was released with bail bonds discharged, and seized property to be disposed per procedure after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Hanmant Vyankappa Surwase (506/2024) The court discharged the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code due to prosecution's failure to advance the case for over a year. The accused was absent from proceedings, prosecution failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and continuing the trial was deemed futile. The accused was released with bail bonds discharged, and seized property to be disposed per procedure after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case