State Of Maharashtra Department of Excise vs Vimalbai Mohan Rathod — 1047/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140022352025

Case disposed

Filing Number

1008/2025

Filing Date

24-07-2025

Registration No

1047/2025

Registration Date

24-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C, Ausa

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

Police StationKillari.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra Department of Excise

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vimalbai Mohan Rathod

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C, Ausa

13-03-2026

Disposed

18-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

21-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

28-08-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra Department of Excise v. Vimalbai Mohan Rathod (1047/2025) The court discharged the accused Vimalbai Mohan Rathod under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, stopping proceedings against her for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that without the chemical analysis report, conviction was impossible even after full trial, making continued proceedings unjustified. The seized liquor (50 bottles of country liquor) will be handed to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra Department of Excise v. Vimalbai Mohan Rathod (1047/2025) The court discharged the accused Vimalbai Mohan Rathod under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, stopping proceedings against her for an offense under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act. The court found that without the chemical analysis report, conviction was impossible even after full trial, making continued proceedings unjustified. The seized liquor (50 bottles of country liquor) will be handed to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case