State Of Maharashtra Department of Excise vs Bura Giri Goud — 1046/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65AE. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140022342025
Filing Number
1007/2025
Filing Date
24-Jul-2025
Registration No
1046/2025
Registration Date
24-Jul-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
Police StationKillari.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra Department of Excise
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bura Giri Goud
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Bura Giri Goud of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing absence of the chemical analysis report as critical evidence. Without this report, conviction was impossible even after full trial. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and ordered seized liquor handed to State Excise Department and the motorcycle returned to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
17-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
20-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
28-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1046/2025
The court discharged accused Bura Giri Goud of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing absence of the chemical analysis report as critical evidence. Without this report, conviction was impossible even after full trial. The court stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, and ordered seized liquor handed to State Excise Department and the motorcycle returned to its owner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts