Swami Samarth Multi State Co Op Credit Society vs Balaji Shivaji Bhojraj — 912/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140017182025
e-Filing Number
10-06-2025
Filing Number
800/2025
Filing Date
17-06-2025
Registration No
912/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Swami Samarth Multi State Co Op Credit Society
Adv. WAGDARE VISHAL MUKTESHWAR
Respondent(s)
Balaji Shivaji Bhojraj
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. CJJD JMFC Ausa
Disposed
Arguments
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 27-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 05-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 912/2025 Court Decision: The First Grade Magistrate Court in Ausa discharged the accused (Balaji Shivaji Bhojraj) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding insufficient evidence of criminal liability. The petitioner (Swami Samarth Multi State Co-op Credit Society) failed to prove the cheque was issued for a debt and that proper notice procedures were followed before filing the complaint. Key Reasoning: The court found that while a cheque (No. 209171 for Rs. 96,468) was presented and dishonored due to insufficient funds, the petitioner could not establish that the cheque was given for a legally enforceable debt obligation or that the statutory notice requirements under the NI Act were properly complied with before initiating criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 912/2025 Court Decision: The First Grade Magistrate Court in Ausa discharged the accused (Balaji Shivaji Bhojraj) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, finding insufficient evidence of criminal liability. The petitioner (Swami Samarth Multi State Co-op Credit Society) failed to prove the cheque was issued for a debt and that proper notice procedures were followed before filing the complaint. Key Reasoning: The court found that while a cheque (No. 209171 for Rs. 96,468) was presented and dishonored due to insufficient funds, the petitioner could not establish that the cheque was given for a legally enforceable debt obligation or that the statutory notice requirements under the NI Act were properly complied with before initiating criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts