State Of Maharashtra vs Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav — 824/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(a),(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140015142025
Filing Number
661/2025
Filing Date
23-May-2025
Registration No
824/2025
Registration Date
23-May-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
144
Police Station
Police StationKillari.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav (824/2025) The court discharged accused Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, finding the case unfit for conviction. The accused was charged under Section 65(a)(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act for alleged liquor possession, but the critical chemical analysis report was never filed, making conviction impossible even after full trial. Consequently, the proceedings were stopped and the seized property (12 bottles of country liquor) directed to State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
06-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
18-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
12-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
20-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 824/2025
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav (824/2025) The court discharged accused Tukaram Vishnudas Yadav under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, finding the case unfit for conviction. The accused was charged under Section 65(a)(e) of Maharashtra Prohibition Act for alleged liquor possession, but the critical chemical analysis report was never filed, making conviction impossible even after full trial. Consequently, the proceedings were stopped and the seized property (12 bottles of country liquor) directed to State Excise Department for disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts