State Of Maharashtra vs Tulashidas Maroti Kamble — 821/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(a),(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140015112025

Filing Number

658/2025

Filing Date

23-May-2025

Registration No

821/2025

Registration Date

23-May-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

125

Police Station

Police StationKillari.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65,(a),(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tulashidas Maroti Kamble

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court discharged accused Tulashidas Maroti Kamble of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, stopping the proceedings. The court found that since the critical chemical analysis report was not filed, conviction would be impossible even after full trial, making continued proceedings unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  5. 26-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  6. 28-Aug-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  7. 19-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 23-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 821/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged accused Tulashidas Maroti Kamble of charges under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by invoking Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, stopping the proceedings. The court found that since the critical chemical analysis report was not filed, conviction would be impossible even after full trial, making continued proceedings unjustifiable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case