State Of Maharashtra vs Shrirang Jema Jadhav Advocate - Shaikh Mahamad P — 118/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a),65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140014562024
Filing Number
532/2024
Filing Date
17-May-2024
Registration No
118/2025
Registration Date
17-May-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
165
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shrirang Jema Jadhav Advocate - Shaikh Mahamad P
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC against the accused in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case due to the accused's continued absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and absence of the Complaint Analysis report over one year after filing. The accused was released, bail bonds discharged, and seized property ordered for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
12-Jun-2025
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
24-Apr-2025
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
25-Feb-2025
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
17-Jan-2025
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
18-Dec-2024
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
12-Nov-2024
Hearing
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
16-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
12-Aug-2024
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
13-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 118/2025
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC against the accused in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case due to the accused's continued absence, prosecution's failure to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and absence of the Complaint Analysis report over one year after filing. The accused was released, bail bonds discharged, and seized property ordered for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts