Manmanth Bhadrappa Swami and other 1 vs Bhimashankar Shivappa Swami and other 2 Advocate - Shinde Shalivahan T — 463/2018

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1). Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA140009852018

Filing Number

633/2018

Filing Date

20-Jun-2018

Registration No

463/2018

Registration Date

20-Jun-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manmanth Bhadrappa Swami and other 1

    Adv. Patel Shahanawaj H

  2. 2.Latabai manmath Swami

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Bhimashankar Shivappa Swami and other 2 Advocate - Shinde Shalivahan T

  2. 2.Sachin Bhimashankar Swami

  3. 3.Shivhar Bhimashankar Swami

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  6. 10-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  7. 11-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  8. 26-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  10. 06-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  11. 09-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  12. 16-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  13. 17-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  14. 19-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  15. 04-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  16. 10-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  17. 18-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  18. 23-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  19. 03-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  20. 13-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  21. 17-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  22. 25-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  23. 05-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  24. 28-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  25. 16-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  26. 24-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  27. 26-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  28. 10-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  29. 04-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  30. 22-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  31. 18-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  32. 07-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  33. 12-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  34. 29-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  35. 18-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  36. 20-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  37. 29-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.

  38. 23-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa

  39. 11-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  40. 13-Jan-2023

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  41. 17-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  42. 09-Dec-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  43. 19-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  44. 01-Nov-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  45. 23-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  46. 05-Sep-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  47. 17-Aug-2022

    Hearing

    3 rd Jt Cjjd and JMFC Ausa

  48. 20-Jul-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  49. 24-Jun-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  50. 20-Apr-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  51. 11-Mar-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  52. 09-Feb-2022

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  53. 07-Jan-2022

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  54. 16-Nov-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  55. 07-Oct-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  56. 14-Sep-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  57. 13-Jul-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  58. 20-Apr-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  59. 05-Mar-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  60. 19-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  61. 07-Nov-2020

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  62. 15-Sep-2020

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  63. 17-Jun-2020

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  64. 18-Mar-2020

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  65. 14-Jan-2020

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  66. 13-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Ausa

  67. 06-Nov-2019

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 463/2018 (Manmath vs. Bhimashankar) Outcome: The defendants' application for appointment of a court commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC was rejected on 06/11/2019. The court found the application was merely an attempt to collect evidence regarding possession, which is not permissible under the law. Since the underlying suit concerns perpetual injunction where both parties must prove their own claims, the defendants bear the burden of proving their counter-claim regarding possession without requiring a court commissioner's intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  68. 06-Nov-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  69. 24-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  70. 20-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  71. 06-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  72. 17-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  73. 25-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  74. 24-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  75. 04-Apr-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  76. 07-Mar-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  77. 05-Feb-2019

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  78. 05-Feb-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  79. 04-Feb-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  80. 22-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  81. 04-Jan-2019

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  82. 17-Dec-2018

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  83. 10-Dec-2018

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  84. 29-Nov-2018

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  85. 08-Oct-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  86. 12-Sep-2018

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  87. 23-Aug-2018

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  88. 14-Aug-2018

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  89. 03-Aug-2018

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  90. 06-Jul-2018

    Written Statement

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  91. 25-Jun-2018

    Notice_Unready

    Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa

  92. 20-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  93. 20-Jun-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 463/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 463/2018 (Manmath vs. Bhimashankar) Outcome: The defendants' application for appointment of a court commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC was rejected on 06/11/2019. The court found the application was merely an attempt to collect evidence regarding possession, which is not permissible under the law. Since the underlying suit concerns perpetual injunction where both parties must prove their own claims, the defendants bear the burden of proving their counter-claim regarding possession without requiring a court commissioner's intervention. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case