State of Maharashtra vs Hanmant Laxman Narayankar — 91/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140009292024
Filing Number
322/2024
Filing Date
21-Mar-2024
Registration No
91/2025
Registration Date
21-Mar-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
009
Police Station
Police Station Ausa
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Hanmant Laxman Narayankar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case 91/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Hanmant Laxman Narayankar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e) case by invoking Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings. The court found that after over one year of pendency since 2024, the accused remained absent, the prosecution failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and the Chargesheet Analysis (C.A.) report remained unfiled, making further trial futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
24-Feb-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
03-Jan-2026
Awaiting Warrant
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
29-Sep-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
14-Jul-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
02-Apr-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
10-Jan-2025
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
29-Nov-2024
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
07-Oct-2024
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
10-Jul-2024
Appearance
Jt. Cjjd JMFC Ausa
-
16-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2025
Case 91/2025 Summary: The court discharged accused Hanmant Laxman Narayankar in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e) case by invoking Section 258 CrPC, stopping proceedings. The court found that after over one year of pendency since 2024, the accused remained absent, the prosecution failed to secure witness presence despite multiple opportunities, and the Chargesheet Analysis (C.A.) report remained unfiled, making further trial futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts