State of Maharashtra vs Kamalakar Tanaji Fadnis — 537/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 05th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA140008962025
Filing Number
342/2025
Filing Date
25-Mar-2025
Registration No
537/2025
Registration Date
25-Mar-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Police StationKillari.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kamalakar Tanaji Fadnis
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis (537/2025) The court acquitted Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis of offences under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023. The acquittal was granted because the chemical analysis report—critical evidence for prosecution—was not filed, making conviction impossible even after full trial. The seized liquor (14 bottles) was ordered handed to the State Excise Department for proper disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
Disposed
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
13-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
11-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
14-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
21-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
28-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.m.f.c, Ausa
-
03-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 537/2025
Case Summary: State v. Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis (537/2025) The court acquitted Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis of offences under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023. The acquittal was granted because the chemical analysis report—critical evidence for prosecution—was not filed, making conviction impossible even after full trial. The seized liquor (14 bottles) was ordered handed to the State Excise Department for proper disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts