State of Maharashtra vs Kamalakar Tanaji Fadnis — 537/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65A,65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 05th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA140008962025

Case disposed

Filing Number

342/2025

Filing Date

25-03-2025

Registration No

537/2025

Registration Date

25-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa

Judge

3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C, Ausa

Decision Date

05th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

Police StationKillari.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65A,65E

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Kamalakar Tanaji Fadnis

Hearing History

Judge: 3-3rd Jt. Civil Judge J.D. and J.M.F.C, Ausa

05-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

11-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

14-11-2025

Awaiting Summons

21-08-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

05-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: State v. Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis (537/2025) The court acquitted Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis of offences under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023. The acquittal was granted because the chemical analysis report—critical evidence for prosecution—was not filed, making conviction impossible even after full trial. The seized liquor (14 bottles) was ordered handed to the State Excise Department for proper disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis (537/2025) The court acquitted Kamalakar Tanaji Phadnis of offences under Section 65(a)(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act and stopped proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023. The acquittal was granted because the chemical analysis report—critical evidence for prosecution—was not filed, making conviction impossible even after full trial. The seized liquor (14 bottles) was ordered handed to the State Excise Department for proper disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case