Munaf Usmansab Kureshi vs Govt of Maharashtra Through Police Station Bhada — 48/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503BNSS2023. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 30th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHLA140007172026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
260/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
48/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Ausa
Judge
2-2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Police StationBhada.
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Munaf Usmansab Kureshi
Adv. BHUJBAL DHANWANTI MANIKRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Govt of Maharashtra Through Police Station Bhada
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Munaf Usmansab Kureshi vs Govt of Maharashtra (48/2026) The court granted interim custody of a seized Mahindra Bolero Pick-up to the applicant, finding him to be the rightful owner. The applicant was required to execute a ₹5 lakh indemnity bond, pay ₹200 daily per cattle for maintenance to the Gaushala, and provide a declaration that the vehicle won't be sold illegally. The court noted idle vehicles deteriorate at police stations and relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized property shouldn't remain in police custody long-term. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
25-Mar-2026
Arguments
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
23-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
18-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
17-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
2nd Jt.C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Ausa.
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 48/2026
Case Summary: Munaf Usmansab Kureshi vs Govt of Maharashtra (48/2026) The court granted interim custody of a seized Mahindra Bolero Pick-up to the applicant, finding him to be the rightful owner. The applicant was required to execute a ₹5 lakh indemnity bond, pay ₹200 daily per cattle for maintenance to the Gaushala, and provide a declaration that the vehicle won't be sold illegally. The court noted idle vehicles deteriorate at police stations and relied on Supreme Court precedent that seized property shouldn't remain in police custody long-term. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts